Human papillomavirus 18 as a poor prognostic factor in stage I-IIA cervical cancer following primary surgical treatment
Loading...
Authors
Yang, Sun-Hye
Kong, Su-Kyoung
Lee, Seung-Ho
Lim, So-Yi
Park, Chan-Yong
Issue Date
2014-11-20
Type
Article
Language
en_US
Keywords
Genotype , Human Papillomavirus , Prognosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Alternative Title
Abstract
Objective:
This study evaluates the effect of the specific human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype as a prognostic factor in stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients following primary surgical treatment.
Methods:
The medical records of 116 cervical cancer patients treated with primary surgical treatment were reviewed. The HPV genotypes were categorized into following groups: negative and unclassified, HPV 16, HPV 18, and other high risk (HPV 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 56, and 58).
Results:
Among the HPV genotypes, HPV 16 predominated (40.52%), followed by intermediate risk and unclassified (25%), HPV 18, 45, and 56 (17.24%) and negative (17.24%). In univariate analysis, HPV genotypes (P=0.03), parametrial spread (P=0.02), depth of invasion (DOI) (P<0.01) and lymph-vascular space invasion (P=0.02) were significantly associated with progression free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, HPV 18 (hazard ratio [HR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 20.90; P=0.02) and ≥one half of DOI (HR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.08 to 27.31; P=0.04) were significantly associated with PFS. HPV genotypes are not significantly associated with overall survival.
Conclusion:
HPV 18 was a poor prognostic factor for the PFS in stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients following primary surgical treatment. Careful long-term observation and regular exams are recommended for cervical cancer patients with HPV 18 compared to those with other HPV genotypes.
Description
Citation
Yang, S. H., Kong, S. K., Lee, S. H., Lim, S. Y., & Park, C. Y. (2014). Human papillomavirus 18 as a poor prognostic factor in stage I-IIA cervical cancer following primary surgical treatment. Obstetrics & gynecology science, 57(6), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2014.57.6.492
Publisher
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science