State policymaking and stated reasons: prenatal care for undocumented immigrants in an era of abortion restriction

Fabi, Rachel E.; Saloner, Brendan; Taylor, Holly

State policymaking and stated reasons: prenatal care for undocumented immigrants in an era of abortion restriction

Files

MILQ-99-693.pdf (192.45 KB)

Authors

Fabi, Rachel E.

Saloner, Brendan

Taylor, Holly

Issue Date

2021-06-24

Type

Article

Language

en_US

Keywords

Undocumented Immigrants , Prenatal Care , Pregnancy , State Policy , Abortion , Reproductive Rights , Medicaid

Abstract

Policy Points: States can create policies that provide access to publicly funded prenatal care for undocumented immigrants that garner support from diverse political coalitions. Policymakers have used a wide range of moral and practical reasons to support the expansion of care to this population, which can be tailored to frame prenatal policies for different stakeholder groups. Context: Even though nearly 6% of citizen babies born in the United States have at least one undocumented parent, undocumented immigrants are ineligible for most public health insurance. Prenatal care is a recommended health service that improves birth outcomes, and some states, including both traditionally “blue” and “red” states, have opted to provide publicly funded coverage for prenatal services for people who are otherwise ineligible due to immigration status. This article explores how courts and legislatures in three states have approached the question of publicly funded prenatal care for undocumented immigrants and its relationship to the abortion debate, with a particular focus on the moral and practical justifications that policymakers employ. Methods: We employed a review and qualitative analysis of the documents that comprise the legislative histories of prenatal policies in three case states: California, New York, and Nebraska. Findings: This review and analysis of policy documents identified moral reasons based on appeals to different conceptions of moral status, respect for autonomy, and justice, as well as prudential reasons that appealed to the health and economic benefits of prenatal care for US citizens and legal residents. We found that much of the variation in reasons supporting policies by state can be traced to the state's position on the protection of reproductive rights and whether the policymakers in each state supported or opposed access to abortion. Interestingly, despite these differences, the states arrived at similar prenatal policies for immigrants. Conclusions: There may be areas where policymakers with different political orientations can converge on health policies affecting access to care for undocumented immigrants. Future research should explore the reception of various message frames for expanding public health insurance coverage to immigrants in other contexts.

Citation

Fabi, R. E., Saloner, B., & Taylor, H. (2021). State Policymaking and Stated Reasons: Prenatal Care for Undocumented Immigrants in an Era of Abortion Restriction. The Milbank quarterly, 99(3), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12519

Publisher

The Milbank Quarterly