Is there a moral obligation to conceive children under the best possible conditions? a preliminary framework for identifying the preconception responsibilities of potential parents

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Bonte, Pieter
Pennings, Guido
Sterckx, Sigrid
Issue Date
2014-01-22
Type
Article
Language
en_US
Keywords
Preconception Care , Beneficence , Folic Acid , Obesity , Genetic Testing
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background: The preventative paradigm of preconception care is receiving increasing attention, yet its boundaries remain vague in three respects: temporally; agentially; and instrumentally. Crucially, it remains unclear just who is to be considered a ‘potential parent’, how soon they should take up preconception responsibilities, and how weighty their responsibilities should be. Discussion: In this paper, we argue that a normal potential parent of reasonable prudence has a moral duty to adequately optimize the conditions under which she or his reproductive partner will conceive, though a proportionality calculus calls for toleration of several forms of preconception behaviour that are non-ideal from the perspective of reproductive risk. We distinguish between five categories of potential parents to which different duties of preconception care should be ascribed. This framework is advanced to assign preconception care responsibilities with more precision than is often done in the current debate on preconception care. We conclude by applying our theoretical framework to three types of preconception care interventions: consumption of folic acid; keeping one’s weight under control; and engaging in preconception genetic screening. Our analysis shows that the literature on preconception care often glosses over crucial distinctions between different types of potential parents and uses a notion of preconception beneficence that may be overly demanding. Nevertheless, preconception moral duties will often be weighty and reluctance to accept such duties on account of the burden they impose do not warrant preconception insouciance. Summary: To avoid misplaced responsibility ascriptions in the growing field of preconception care, distinctions must be made between different types of potential parents to whom different degrees of preconception responsibility apply. We present such a preliminary framework and bring it to bear on the cases of folic acid consumption, obesity and genetic testing.
Description
Citation
Bonte, P., Pennings, G., & Sterckx, S. (2014). Is there a moral obligation to conceive children under the best possible conditions? A preliminary framework for identifying the preconception responsibilities of potential parents. BMC medical ethics, 15, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-5
Publisher
BMC Medical Ethics
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
EISSN